Read on about what preceded:
Brief history
After an exploration, the Council for Culture and the Social and Economic Council released the advisory report “Passion Valued” in 2017. The earning power of workers in the cultural and creative sector lags behind, they noted. The councils called for the development of guidelines for reasonable compensation. Based on this, a Labor Market Agenda appeared in 2017 with three spearheads: structural social dialogue, strengthening earning capacity, improving working conditions. Also, the Fair Practice Code emerged with three principles: fair pay, fair share, fair chain.
Legal provisions without compensation for companies and organizations
The Heritage Act (and predecessors) has many provisions. For example, only companies or (government) organizations with a national certificate may conduct excavations at archaeologically protected monuments and areas. There are also guidelines that ensure that certain operations are reserved only for high-quality actors/archaeologists. In addition, based on the General Administrative Law Act (as of January 1, the Environment Act), concrete investigations and excavations, usually require local environmental permits. However, there are no government funds for the high costs that may be involved in the legal provisions. Even state compensation to municipalities for excessive excavation costs in special cases disappeared entirely in 2012. On top of this, many governments keep the price very low in their own tenders for archaeological investigations, excavations and the like. These market forces ensure that there are almost no profit margins for the businesses and organizations involved, so that fair pay for workers, among other things, is difficult to achieve.
Specific preliminary investigations
With a grant from the Ministry of OCW, Platform ACCT commissioned the preliminary study “Archaeologists, terms of employment and working conditions in the Netherlands” by HTH Research in December 2020. It took place as part of the evaluation of the Heritage Act. Followed in March 2021 by the report ‘Better Terms of Employment and Working Conditions in the Cultural and Creative Sector. A Proposal for Follow-up Steps 2021-2024.’ The recommendations were as follows. Repeat surveys in the form of a Labor Market Monitor, preferably part of the Heritage Monitor. Conversations with vulnerable groups about their labor market position and needs. Put on the agenda, among other things, in the evaluation of the Erfgoedwer the effect of market forces on the labor market position. An overview or benchmark of the terms of employment and working conditions offered at excavation companies. Investigate the feasibility of a collective labor agreement for archaeology (and how it should be implemented). Draw up rate guidelines with minimum or standard rates for self-employed archaeologists. Create support. Security and enforcement to be determined later.
Program fairPACCT and composition Chain Table from 2022 onward
Platfom ACCT’s three-year fairPACCT program has begun as of 2022 with the help of OCW funding to concretize fair pay. The Archaeology Chain Table started in March 2022. It currently consists of ten members: four general workers, two specialists, a representative of a vocational school, two companies and an employment agency. Henk Koster, a.o. director of the Infrastructure Quality Assurance Soil Management Foundation, is independent chairman.
Current Labor Market Monitor for Archaeology
Currently, as recommended in the HTH preliminary study, the Chain Table is presenting a current Labor Market Monitor. It is the report ‘Inventory of Working Conditions in Archaeology. Based on a survey of the profession.’ by Femke Tomas, lecturer/researcher at Saxion University of Applied Sciences. For the sake of completeness, it should be stated in advance that archaeologists have an HBO or WO education.
Work field data
The survey with 416 respondents (a quarter of the estimated population) and five in-depth interviews revealed the following vulnerable groups among the employed:
– Respondents without a CLA. They also earn relatively less than respondents with a CAO and are less satisfied with their advancement opportunities and hours.
– Young archaeologists. They earn relatively less, are (obviously) less likely to have actor status, and are more likely to have temporary contracts.
– Women. They have temporary contracts slightly more often than men and earn relatively less than men. It also appears that women are more likely to drop out or not start work in archaeology.
– People with disabilities. Alumni with disabilities make up a smaller percentage of the labor market in archaeology.
It should be added that the average gross hourly wage of the archaeological field is significantly lower than the average gross hourly wage in the Netherlands until about 45 years of age.
Recommendations to the Chain Table
The respondents have a clear preference for a CLA, provided that the advantages/disadvantages for the various groups are clearly identified and clearly communicated. They advocated taking inspiration from other collective labor agreements, such as the collective labor agreement for construction and infrastructure, the collective labor agreement for green space, soil and infrastructure, and looking at the terms of employment in adjacent fields, such as soil and subsoil, as well as the collective labor agreement for the government.
In a collective bargaining agreement, consider pension accrual, compensation for long travel time and working in harsh conditions. Respondents would also like to see consideration in fringe benefits for a work car, home work allowance, higher mileage allowance, travel time as work time, training, reimbursement for intern/residence, physical therapy, overtime, number of vacation days and senior days.
It was also noted that there seems to be a negative price spiral in the archaeological field within the current market forces. This is related to working conditions and the quality of the archaeological research/product to be delivered.
Suggested:
– To determine what are commercially fair prices, look to adjacent disciplines, such as within earth sciences, environmental health research or the soil sector.
– Agree on a percentage of the construction cost.
– Investigate the possibility of market-correcting agreements.
Finally, the respondents also drew attention to the low wages and the many temporary and 0-hour contracts. Also introduce a benchmark by archaeological businesses, the introduction of rates for self-employed workers and, of course, the collective bargaining agreement, if any. Draw up a job matrix for archaeology.
To be noted:
”F. Tomas, lecturer/researcher Hogeschool Saxion, Inventory of working conditions in archaeology. Based on a survey of the profession. June 2023′
Idem, Appendix 1. Final standard questionnaire labor monitors archaeology
Idem, Appendix 2. Questionnaire survey labor market conditions archaeology 2022-2023
Idem, Appendix 3. Results Research Working Conditions Archaeology ACCT details
Idem, Appendix 4. Chain Table Archaeology project plan inventory working conditions
Learn more
Completion form (You can e-mail the completion form back preferably before November 1 and no later than November 15 to fairpacct@platformacct.nl)
FairPACCT chain table Archaeology (read more under the heading ‘current’ or ‘about the table’)